New Education Policy 2019 Pdf
The Draft National Education Policy 2019 is out in the open space. Drawing contributions from the T.S.R. Subramanian Committee report and the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), the K. Kasturirangan Committee has delivered the approach record.Remarkable highlights of NEP 2019:The strategy intends to universalize the pre-essential instruction by 2025 and give primary proficiency/numeracy for all by 2025
New Education Policy 2019 Pdf
  • It proposes new Curricular and Pedagogical Structure, with 5+3+3+4 plan covering the youngsters in the age bunch 3-18 years. Under this, Pre-Primary and Grades 1-2 is considered as central Stage; Grades 3-5 as Preparatory Stage; Grades 6-8 as Middle Stage and Grades 9-12 as Secondary Stage. This is a scholastic rebuilding in particular; there will be no physical rebuilding of schools Widespread Access and Retention with 100% Gross Enrolment Ratio for all school instruction by 2030. 
  • Kids learn dialects, most immediately between 2-8 years, and multilingualism has extraordinary intellectual advantages for understudies. Along these lines a three-language equation has been proposed 
  • It proposes the instructing of other old style dialects and writing, including Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Odia, Pali, Persian, and Prakrit in schools 
  • Another autonomous State School Regulatory Authority (SSRA) to be made 
  • It expects to combine 800 colleges and 40,000 universities into around 15,000 huge, multidisciplinary organizations 
  • The strategy proposes three sorts of Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs): Research Universities, Teaching Universities and Autonomous degree-giving schools 
  • It expects to give self-governance to all advanced education organizations. Advanced education foundations to be administered by Independent Boards with complete scholarly and regulatory self-governance 
  • A self-sufficient body called the National Research Foundation (NRF) to be set up through an Act of Parliament 
  • Rashtriya Shiksha Aayog or the National Education Commission - peak body - to be established. It will be led by the Prime Minister and will include prominent educationists, analysts, Union Ministers, portrayal of Chief Ministers of States, famous experts from different fields 
  • MHRD to be re-assigned as the Ministry of Education (MoE) 
  • Increment in open speculation by the Central and State Governments to 20% of in general open use over a multi year time span 
Perspectives on the side of Draft National Education Policy 2019: 
  • The school instruction will cover offspring of 3-18 years, rather than the present 6-14 years under the RTE Act. It covers three years under early youth care and training (ECCE) and four years under optional instruction. ECCE would encourage play and disclosure based learning for offspring of that age gathering 
  • Its accentuation on primary language based training and oral language advancement are basic 
  • The approach centers around web based learning as an option in contrast to standard study hall connection among educators and understudies. It helps in accomplishing the twin targets of reducing expenses and expanding enlistment 
  • It intends to ensure and advance our way of life through the investigation of old style dialects, primary languages, and local dialects 
  • The instructor training framework will be changed, with thorough readiness through a four-year coordinated stage and subject-explicit projects offered in multi-disciplinary establishments 
  • The draft discusses the better commitment of the private part and provisioning for government subsidizing for R&D work through a proposed national research finance 
  • Proficient training will turn into a basic piece of the advanced education framework
Downsides in the Draft National Education Policy: 
  • The draft approach is quiet on the Institutions of Eminence and organizations like the Higher Education Funding Agency 
  • The approach doesn't address with adequate clearness curricular, academic and educator instruction related issues that plague the educating and learning of early proficiency in numerous Indian study halls 
  • The arrangement proposes to a great extent oral exercises for the pre-essential evaluations, perusing hours for Grades 1-3, with an extra hour for composing beginning just in Grades 4 and 5. It negates proof recommending that small kids be shown tuning in, talking, perusing and composing all the while and not successively 
  • It needs dialog about the stuff to plan instructors to effectively educate basic proficiency in a multilingual nation. Rather, the record prescribes enrolling volunteers and network individuals to help the procurement of early proficiency. Volunteers can be utilized, however can't be an essential instrument to convey basic education to understudies 
  • It misdiagnoses the causes behind the extreme learning emergency - in particular poor school and instructor responsibility. There is no principal change proposed for redoing the responsibility structures for schools. Rather, the NEP gives school the executives panels (SMCs). SMCs as of now ordered under the RTE Act are insufficient 
  • With the democratization of information and accessibility of innovation for simple access to data, the draft ought to have concentrated more on the best way to instruct and not just on what to educate 
  • The National Research Foundation (NRF) is entrusted with "saturating the way of life of research and development" and tending to cultural difficulties. However, there is no instrument, for example, creative educational plans or expansion units, for level II or level III establishments to take a shot at neighborhood issues. It has no entrance or responsibility to individuals or their delegates 
  • The Constitution places training in the Concurrent List, giving power and duty to both the States and the Center. In any case, the draft had burglarized the States by making an unnecessarily concentrated structure of power and vesting all-encompassing forces with the PM-drove Rashtriya Shiksha Aayog (RSA) 
  • In advancing the investigation of territorial dialects, the significance of English is disregarded. The individuals who are conversant in the English language live in family units with multiple times higher salary than those with no information on English. By overlooking this, the Draft NEP19 has spread out a "language trap", which will make social disparity and obstruct monetary development because of loss of the statistic profit 
  • The report doesn't underline enough the job and significance of state governments in giving instruction to the majority
Important Link : 
Download pdf from here

Conclusion:
Suggestions of the Draft National Education Policy will play a critical role in the transformation of the Indian education system. It is expected to help India in reaping its demographic dividend. However, the Draft National Education Policy has certain sore points that need to be relooked at for the benefit of teachers and students alike.